Priyadatt Patel: Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Should Be Assessed After 2 Losses
Priyadatt Patel, Senior Gynecologist, Advanced Laparoscopic Surgeon, IVF and Endometriosis Programme Lead at Balaji Horizon Women’s Hospital, shared on LinkedIn:
“Being told to wait until you have lost three pregnancies before anyone will investigate is one of the harder things a couple can hear. That threshold has changed – and it’s worth knowing.
International guidance (ESHRE, 2023) now defines recurrent pregnancy loss as two or more losses, and supports beginning a structured assessment after two – not necessarily consecutive. Earlier, kinder, and more useful than waiting for a third.
A considered evaluation looks for the genuinely treatable things, or that change the plan: a clotting condition (antiphospholipid syndrome), thyroid and other hormonal factors, the shape of the uterus, and – a more recent addition to the guideline – adenomyosis. Genetic factors are weighed where relevant.
Two honest points matter as much as the tests themselves.
First, even after a complete, careful work-up, around half of recurrent losses have no identified cause. That is not a failure of testing – and ‘unexplained’ is not the same as ‘untreatable’ or ‘hopeless.’ For many couples in this group, the outlook for a future successful pregnancy is better than the fear suggests.
Second, more testing is not automatically better care. Many add-on investigations and immune ‘treatments’ marketed for miscarriage are not supported by good evidence, and ESHRE specifically advises against several of them. Where treatment does help, it is targeted: vaginal progesterone improves live-birth rates specifically for women who have both previous miscarriage(s) and current early-pregnancy bleeding – not for everyone.
Good care for recurrent loss is measured, evidence-based and honest: it investigates what is worth investigating, treats what is genuinely treatable, and offers realistic hope rather than a long list of unproven add-ons.
If you have had two or more losses, it is reasonable to ask for a structured assessment – and, of any test or treatment offered, to ask what the evidence actually shows.”

Stay informed with the latest updates in fertility and reproductive medicine on Fertility News.
-
Aug 7, 2026, 16:08Diana Kayal: Some of the Things That Affect Fertility are Sitting in Your Kitchen Cupboard
-
Aug 7, 2026, 15:12Elizabeth Crammond: Improving Women’s Healthcare in Scotland – A Call for Safer, Integrated Care
-
Aug 7, 2026, 14:59Kalpesh Kapadia: A Man’s Semen Analysis May Be the Most Under-Ordered Health Test in India
-
Aug 7, 2026, 14:35Devyanshi Dixit: IVF Is More Than a Treatment…
-
Aug 7, 2026, 13:55Does the Pill Really Delay Fertility? – Fertility Plus
-
Aug 7, 2026, 13:44Sean Lauber: What to Expect After Complete Embryo Arrest During IVF
-
Aug 7, 2026, 11:28Swarup K. Chakrabarti: The Gut-Ovary Connection – A New Frontier in Fertility
-
Aug 7, 2026, 10:18Kothwal Jabeen: Do Antidepressants Affect Fertility?
-
Aug 6, 2026, 18:18Every Pin is a Family’s Story – IVF Couriers
