NewsFeed
April, 2026
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
No Difference Between Natural and Artificial Cycles in Endometrium Cases – RBMO
Apr 16, 2026, 17:24

No Difference Between Natural and Artificial Cycles in Endometrium Cases – RBMO

Reproductive BioMedicine Online (RBMO) shared a post on LinkedIn:

“In a new study published in or April issue, Aikaterini Selntigia, Giovanni Coticchio, and Mauro Cozzolino demonstrate that reproductive outcomes in women with thin endometrium (<7 mm) are not significantly influenced by the choice between modified natural cycle (mNC) and artificial cycle for endometrial preparation.

As shown in their results, embryo quality and day of transfer seem to be more critical determinants of success than the preparation protocol itself. The findings in this paper contribute to the growing body of evidence suggesting that a thin endometrium should not be considered an absolute contraindication to embryo transfer. The practice of cancelling embryo transfer and shifting to an alternative endometrial preparation protocol does not seem to be justified. Therefore, individualized treatment strategies remain essential, also in accordance with preferences of patients.

RBMO subscribers can read the full paper from our in-press articles section now.”

Title: No difference in live birth rates observed between alternative endometrial preparation regimens in thin endometrium

Authors: Aikaterini Selntigiaa, Giovanni Coticchiod, Mauro Cozzolino

No Difference Between Natural and Artificial Cycles in Endometrium Cases – RBMO

Stay updated on all scientific advances in the field of fertility with Fertility News.