Yannick Hurni: What Is a ‘Normal Uterus’? From Morphology to Function
Yannick Hurni, Junior mentor of PPCR 2026 at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, shared a post on LinkedIn:
“Paper of the Week 11 — What is a ‘normal uterus’? The endless debate
What do we really mean when we say ‘normal’?
The recent NURSE study (January 2026) sets an impressive milestone: a large, multicentric cohort providing, for the first time, objective morphometric reference values for the uterus in presumed healthy nulliparous women.
The strength of this work lies in its numbers, its rigor, and its methodology. Not because it immediately changes clinical practice, but because it builds something even more important: a solid, reproducible foundation on which future research can stand.
And yet… the story doesn’t end there.
In the April issue of Fertility and Sterility, the discussion takes an interesting turn. Christian Battipaglia and Antonio LA MARCA challenge the very concept of ‘normality’, reminding us that statistical normal ≠ biological normal.
They propose a shift in perspective: should we define normality based on morphology alone, or should we instead look at functional normality, i.e., the ability to reproduce?
This is where the debate becomes truly fascinating.
The authors of the NURSE study (Marco Gergolet, Pierpaolo Nicolì, Amerigo Vitagliano) respond with remarkable scientific clarity and methodological rigor.
Their position is equally compelling:
- First, define morphology objectively.
- Then, build correlations with function.
Because without a solid baseline, any functional interpretation risks becoming inconsistent, or worse, biased.
This is exactly the kind of debate we need to keep alive.
We must start from robust, shared, scientific definitions, but we cannot stop there. The next step is inevitable: moving toward functional and outcome-based frameworks, which may eventually reshape our classifications into tools that are truly meaningful both clinically and for research.
Morphometry first… but function must follow.
Have you read these papers?
If not, I strongly recommend going back to the NURSE study and then diving into this passionate exchange.
I’m curious to hear your thoughts. Where do you stand in this debate?”

Stay updated on all scientific advances in the field of fertility with Fertility News.
-
Nov 2, 2026, 17:08Elena Milner: The 2nd Class of the School of Embryology Is Already in Full Swing
-
Nov 2, 2026, 17:05November Is National Diabetes Month – PCOS Awareness Association
-
Nov 2, 2026, 17:04Thanos Papathanasiou: Are We Preparing Patients for the IVF Cycle, or for the IVF Journey?
-
Nov 2, 2026, 17:02Anna Morales: Why Is It So Hard to Build in Women’s Health?
-
Nov 2, 2026, 16:59Rickard Ericsson: Honored to Take on the Role of Interim CEO of the Vitrolife Group
-
Nov 2, 2026, 16:56Mohammed Nasur: 1 Small Simulation, A Bigger Purpose
-
Nov 2, 2026, 16:54Carlos Guerrero: Presenting Our Latest Research on AI and Embryo Assessment at ASRM 2026
-
Nov 2, 2026, 16:52Sarah Lewen: My 1st ASRM Is Officially Complete
-
Nov 2, 2026, 16:49Jemma Garratt: Taking on the Role of Kind IVF and Data Science Manager at London Women’s Clinic
