Yannick Hurni: What Is a ‘Normal Uterus’? From Morphology to Function
Yannick Hurni, Junior mentor of PPCR 2026 at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, shared a post on LinkedIn:
“Paper of the Week 11 — What is a ‘normal uterus’? The endless debate
What do we really mean when we say ‘normal’?
The recent NURSE study (January 2026) sets an impressive milestone: a large, multicentric cohort providing, for the first time, objective morphometric reference values for the uterus in presumed healthy nulliparous women.
The strength of this work lies in its numbers, its rigor, and its methodology. Not because it immediately changes clinical practice, but because it builds something even more important: a solid, reproducible foundation on which future research can stand.
And yet… the story doesn’t end there.
In the April issue of Fertility and Sterility, the discussion takes an interesting turn. Christian Battipaglia and Antonio LA MARCA challenge the very concept of ‘normality’, reminding us that statistical normal ≠ biological normal.
They propose a shift in perspective: should we define normality based on morphology alone, or should we instead look at functional normality, i.e., the ability to reproduce?
This is where the debate becomes truly fascinating.
The authors of the NURSE study (Marco Gergolet, Pierpaolo Nicolì, Amerigo Vitagliano) respond with remarkable scientific clarity and methodological rigor.
Their position is equally compelling:
- First, define morphology objectively.
- Then, build correlations with function.
Because without a solid baseline, any functional interpretation risks becoming inconsistent, or worse, biased.
This is exactly the kind of debate we need to keep alive.
We must start from robust, shared, scientific definitions, but we cannot stop there. The next step is inevitable: moving toward functional and outcome-based frameworks, which may eventually reshape our classifications into tools that are truly meaningful both clinically and for research.
Morphometry first… but function must follow.
Have you read these papers?
If not, I strongly recommend going back to the NURSE study and then diving into this passionate exchange.
I’m curious to hear your thoughts. Where do you stand in this debate?”

Stay updated on all scientific advances in the field of fertility with Fertility News.
-
Aug 3, 2026, 14:19Asmaa Khaled: The Success of IVF is Not Determined By the Number of Eggs Retrieved Alone…
-
Aug 3, 2026, 14:03Clare Mansfield: Sometimes the Path to Parenthood Changes, but the Dream Doesn’t Have To
-
Aug 3, 2026, 13:45Undiga Emuekpere: Basic Fertility Health Awareness Could Change Outcomes
-
Aug 3, 2026, 13:31Priyadatt Patel: A Quiet Inefficiency in How We Approach Infertility Deserves More Attention
-
Aug 3, 2026, 13:21Purabi Gunjal: Most Women Start Thinking about Fertility Too Late…
-
Aug 3, 2026, 13:10Juhee Jain: Empowering Women with the Right Information to Make Informed Decisions
-
Aug 3, 2026, 12:57Ashley Evans: Sometimes, the Thing that Got Me Through Fertility Treatment Wasn’t Positivity…
-
Aug 3, 2026, 12:42Devyanshi Dixit: Why Do the Best Healthcare Professionals Never Stop Learning?
-
Aug 3, 2026, 12:30Bringing Together the Brightest Minds in Reproductive Medicine for 3 Days at MEFS 2026
