Yannick Hurni: What Is a ‘Normal Uterus’? From Morphology to Function
Yannick Hurni, Junior mentor of PPCR 2026 at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, shared a post on LinkedIn:
“Paper of the Week 11 — What is a ‘normal uterus’? The endless debate
What do we really mean when we say ‘normal’?
The recent NURSE study (January 2026) sets an impressive milestone: a large, multicentric cohort providing, for the first time, objective morphometric reference values for the uterus in presumed healthy nulliparous women.
The strength of this work lies in its numbers, its rigor, and its methodology. Not because it immediately changes clinical practice, but because it builds something even more important: a solid, reproducible foundation on which future research can stand.
And yet… the story doesn’t end there.
In the April issue of Fertility and Sterility, the discussion takes an interesting turn. Christian Battipaglia and Antonio LA MARCA challenge the very concept of ‘normality’, reminding us that statistical normal ≠ biological normal.
They propose a shift in perspective: should we define normality based on morphology alone, or should we instead look at functional normality, i.e., the ability to reproduce?
This is where the debate becomes truly fascinating.
The authors of the NURSE study (Marco Gergolet, Pierpaolo Nicolì, Amerigo Vitagliano) respond with remarkable scientific clarity and methodological rigor.
Their position is equally compelling:
- First, define morphology objectively.
- Then, build correlations with function.
Because without a solid baseline, any functional interpretation risks becoming inconsistent, or worse, biased.
This is exactly the kind of debate we need to keep alive.
We must start from robust, shared, scientific definitions, but we cannot stop there. The next step is inevitable: moving toward functional and outcome-based frameworks, which may eventually reshape our classifications into tools that are truly meaningful both clinically and for research.
Morphometry first… but function must follow.
Have you read these papers?
If not, I strongly recommend going back to the NURSE study and then diving into this passionate exchange.
I’m curious to hear your thoughts. Where do you stand in this debate?”

Stay updated on all scientific advances in the field of fertility with Fertility News.
-
Sep 18, 2026, 20:27Hrishikesh Pai: Rethinking Male Infertility
-
Sep 18, 2026, 20:25Eric Verdin: Wrapping Up the Reproductive Aging Summit at the Center for Healthy Aging in Women
-
Sep 18, 2026, 20:21Investigating Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Idiopathic POI – RBMO
-
Sep 18, 2026, 20:18Sue Ritchie: Why Aren’t We Talking About Male Fertility More?
-
Sep 18, 2026, 20:13Salma Yasin: Every Day of BFS Study Week 2026 Has Been an Exceptional Learning Experience
-
Sep 18, 2026, 20:01Qingcai Wang: Over 35 and Torn Between Trying Longer and Starting IVF?
-
Sep 18, 2026, 19:58Bhumika: Can a Woman Become Pregnant Again While Already Pregnant?
-
Sep 18, 2026, 19:5215 More Experts Join the International Fertility Forum Mumbai 2026
-
Sep 18, 2026, 19:50Curious About What Happens Behind the Scenes in the Labs? – Sims IVF
