NewsFeed
August, 2026
August 2026
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  
Ashish Jalak: What We Changed After 3 Failed IVF Cycles
Aug 16, 2026, 15:52

Ashish Jalak: What We Changed After 3 Failed IVF Cycles

Ashish Jalak, Founder and Chairman of Shree Chaitanya Test Tube Baby Centre, shared on LinkedIn:

“Three IVF cycles failed. The fourth brought a positive pregnancy.

But what changed?

Instead of simply repeating another IVF cycle, the team took a closer look at what may have contributed to the previous failures and adjusted the approach based on the patient’s individual findings.

Because sometimes, after a failed IVF cycle, the next step isn’t simply trying again. It is understanding what happened.

Read the full article to understand what was reviewed, what changed in the fourth cycle, and why a fresh evaluation can sometimes make a difference.

After Three Failed IVF Cycles Elsewhere, the Fourth One Finally Worked

A patient came to Shree Chaitanya Test Tube Baby Centre after three failed IVF cycles at other clinics.

Three cycles of hope, three disappointments, and a growing worry that IVF simply wasn’t going to work in this case.

The fourth cycle, done with our team, resulted in a positive pregnancy. Here is what we found, and why it made all the difference.

Three Failed Cycles Don’t Always Mean a Difficult Case

When patients come to us after multiple failed IVF attempts elsewhere, there is often an assumption that the case must be unusually complicated. In reality, this is not always true.

In this case, the previous cycles had followed a fairly standard IVF protocol. Medications, egg retrieval, fertilization, and embryo transfer were repeated three times, with only minor adjustments between attempts. What hadn’t happened yet was a deeper investigation into why the embryos weren’t implanting.

What We Looked at Differently

Before starting a fourth cycle, our team at Shree Chaitanya IVF Clinic focused on a few areas that are often overlooked after repeated IVF failures:

  • Uterine receptivity:
    We evaluated whether the uterine lining was actually receptive at the time of embryo transfer in previous cycles, an important factor that isn’t always checked closely.
  • Embryo quality versus implantation issues:
    We reviewed whether previous failures were more likely linked to embryo quality or to the uterine environment, since the treatment approach for each is very different.
  • Hormonal and immune factors:
    Certain underlying hormonal imbalances or immune factors can affect implantation, even when embryos appear to be of good quality.
  • Male fertility factors:
    As with many cases we see, a more detailed semen analysis was carried out, since male fertility factors are frequently under-investigated after repeated female-focused treatment cycles.

What Changed in the Fourth Cycle

Based on what we found, our team adjusted the treatment plan in a few specific ways:

  • A revised stimulation protocol suited to the individual’s ovarian response
  • Careful timing of the embryo transfer based on uterine receptivity
  • Closer monitoring throughout the cycle, rather than a standard fixed schedule
  • Additional support based on the specific factors identified during evaluation

None of these changes were dramatic or experimental. They were simply more precise, based on a more complete understanding of the case, something that a first, second, or even third cycle doesn’t always uncover if the same protocol is repeated without adjustment.

What This Case Teaches Us

  1. Repeating the same protocol after a failure rarely changes the outcome. If a cycle fails, the next attempt needs to ask why, not simply try again.
  2. Implantation failure and embryo quality are not the same problem. Treating them as the same issue can lead to repeated, avoidable failures.
  3. A second opinion after failed cycles is often worth it. A fresh, detailed review can surface factors that were missed in earlier treatment cycles.
  4. Patience with the diagnosis matters as much as patience with the process. Sometimes, one more thorough evaluation before moving ahead makes more difference than one more repeated attempt.

Why This Matters If You’ve Had Failed IVF Cycles Elsewhere

If you have already been through one or more unsuccessful IVF cycles at another clinic, this case is a reminder that failure does not always mean IVF isn’t right for you. It often means the specific reason behind that failure hasn’t been fully identified yet.

At Shree Chaitanya Test Tube Baby Centre, our team, led by me, along with our experienced IVF consultants across Pune, Baramati, Satara, and Ahilyanagar, reviews each patient’s previous treatment history in detail before recommending a new cycle, rather than simply repeating what was tried before.

Final Thoughts

Three failed IVF cycles elsewhere, followed by one successful fourth attempt, is a reminder that outcomes can change significantly when the approach becomes more specific to the patient, not just more repeated. If your previous IVF cycles haven’t worked, it may be worth asking a new clinic for a fresh, detailed evaluation before starting again.”

Stay informed with the latest updates in fertility and reproductive medicine on Fertility News.