Sharon Davidesko Highlights the Need to Normalize Vulval Anatomy Education
Sharon Davidesko, Complex Gynaecology and Endometriosis Fellow at King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, shared a post on LinkedIn:
“This week, Meta removed an educational diagram of a vulva for violating community standards. We cannot show people what normal looks like. And it is showing up in my clinic.
She was eleven. Her labia minora were completely normal and entirely within a spectrum she’d never been shown.
Just by being brought to a gynaecology clinic she may have been receiving a subtle message that maybe something is wrong with her.
I’m a gynaecology fellow, a mother of a ten-year-old girl, and a woman who grew up in the same culture I’m describing. I have absorbed things too. I am not observing this from the outside.
The messages start early. And they are remarkably hard to unlearn.
When someone tries to address that gap, as the The Eve Appeal did this week, sharing a clearly annotated illustration of vulval anatomy to help people recognise signs of cancer, it gets flagged as sexual content. Removed. When eventually reinstated, marked as material that “might upset people.”
An educational diagram about cancer detection, treated as obscenity.
This isn’t an isolated incident. A CensHERship white paper published this month found that 95% of women’s health organisations, charities and creators have experienced censorship or suppression when discussing women’s health online. Over half now self-censor as a result.
There is an open letter to Meta to stop censoring vital gynae health information. I’ve signed it. If you haven’t yet, the link is in the comments.
I see the endpoint of this sometimes in my adult practice. Women asking about labiaplasty (surgical reduction of the labia minora for those who’ve not encountered the term) for labia that are completely normal. The reasons are rarely about physical discomfort.
Girls who grew up googling, comparing, concluding. Women who have been carrying that conclusion ever since.
That eleven-year-old is at the beginning of that same journey.
Which is why, when I think about that consultation, I find myself less focused on what I said about the anatomy and more focused less tangible outcomes. Did she leave that room feeling more settled in her body, or less? Did the visit help, or did it plant something?
I hope the former. I’m not sure though.
As a doctor I was trained to reassure. As a mother I know that reassurance isn’t always the same as resolution. Sometimes the most important intervention isn’t what happens in the clinic room – it’s what gets said, or unsaid, in the car on the way home.
In the photo the excellent resource So What is a Vulva Anyway? published by British Society for Paediatrics and Adolescent Gynaecology (BritSPAG).”
Stay updated on all scientific advances in the field of fertility with Fertility News.
-
May 20, 2026, 10:04ACOG’s Rate Navigator Report is Officially Live – ACOG
-
May 20, 2026, 10:01Efficacy and Safety of a One-Step Warming Protocol of Vitrified Blastocysts – Fertility and Sterility
-
May 20, 2026, 09:36Pelvic Pain and Endometriosis Featured in ISUOG World Congress 2026 Programme – ISUOG
-
May 20, 2026, 07:59Yogita Date: Connecting with Brilliant Minds at Elevate 2026
-
May 20, 2026, 07:45George Lainas: Embryo or Endometrium? IVF Experts to Discuss Key Drivers of Implantation
-
May 20, 2026, 07:27Christopher Robinson: SNRI vs SSRI and the Risk of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy
-
May 20, 2026, 04:59Chiara Innocenzi: Grateful to IJGC for Welcoming Me to Collaborate on This Forward-Thinking Educational Project
-
May 20, 2026, 04:29Evidence-Based Prepregnancy Care for Maternal and Neonatal Health – JAMA
-
May 19, 2026, 17:47Fertility 2027 Opens Abstract Submissions for Researchers and Experts – Fertility Conferences