Aiden Dashti: Embryo and Oocyte Vitrification Devices at a Glance
Aiden Dashti, Independent Medical Sales Contractor at Olympus Australia and New Zealand, shared on LinkedIn:
“Embryo and Oocyte Vitrification Devices – At a Glance
Vitrification has become an essential part of modern assisted reproductive technology, but the device used to vitrify and store an embryo or oocyte is more than just a carrier.
Today, embryology laboratories can choose from a wide range of vitrification devices, each with different approaches to loading, handling, cooling, storage, warming, and protection during the Vitrification Procedure.
I tried to put together this overview of some of the major devices currently available in the IVF market, considering ongoing product developments.
- Cryotop – Kitazato
- S-Cryolock – Biotech Cryolock
- Cryotec – Cryotec Global
- VitriFit – CooperSurgical Fertility Solutions
- SUPERVITRI – BPB MEDICA
- SureLock – Allwin Medical Devices
- Rapid-i – Vitrolife, Part of Vitrolife Group
- Cryo-GO – Nexpring Health
One of the most important differences is the open vs. closed vitrification approach.
Open systems can provide extremely rapid heat transfer through direct contact with liquid nitrogen, while closed systems are designed to physically isolate the specimen from direct LN₂ exposure. But this is only one part of the decision.
In daily embryology practice, factors such as minimal-volume loading, cooling and warming performance, ease of handling, visibility of the specimen, secure closure, identification, storage efficiency, laboratory workflow, and operator experience all matter.
And ultimately, there is no single device that is automatically the ‘best Vitrification Device’ for every IVF laboratory.
The most appropriate system is the one that performs consistently within a laboratory’s validated vitrification protocol, meets applicable regulatory and quality requirements, and allows embryologists to work safely, efficiently, and reproducibly.
The infographic below provides a quick overview of some of the major options and their practical advantages and considerations.
Disclaimer: This post is intended solely to provide general market information and does not advertise, endorse, promote, or discredit any particular brand or vitrification device. The information is shared for educational and professional discussion purposes only.
Embryologists and IVF professionals: Which vitrification device do you currently use, and what feature matters most to you when choosing a system?”

Stay informed with the latest updates in fertility and reproductive medicine on Fertility News.
-
Oct 29, 2026, 16:22Aysha O’Connor: One of the Hardest Parts of My Own Fertility Journey Was Loneliness…
-
Oct 29, 2026, 16:15Chaithra S K: Preimplantation Genetic Testing Still Requires an Embryo Biopsy
-
Oct 29, 2026, 16:11Filipina Woman’s Journey of Strength, Hope, and Finding Balance While Living with PCOS – PCOS Millennials
-
Oct 29, 2026, 15:58Eric Lameignere: Can DNA Fragmentation in Cumulus Cells Predict ICSI Outcomes?
-
Oct 29, 2026, 15:50Saadat Hassan: Sperm Function Testing – Can Advanced Diagnostics Guide IVF and ICSI Selection?
-
Oct 29, 2026, 15:34Sara Spiro: Celebrating the Stories Members Have Trusted With at Maven Clinic – Here Is Mine
-
Oct 29, 2026, 15:31Dina Ibrahem: 0 Motility, 1 Critical Decision
-
Oct 29, 2026, 15:28AI and Automation in Fertility and Genomics: Pipeline or Pipe Dream? – ARCS
-
Oct 29, 2026, 15:26Michael Schindler: Large Networks or Small Centers – Who Delivers Better Care?
