Jorge Lima: Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Affects 1% of Women, Yet 37% of Cases Remain Unexplained
Jorge Lima, Professor Auxiliar Convidado at NOVA Medical School, shared a post on LinkedIn:
“Now published: Systematic review and meta-analysis on recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL)
I’m pleased to share our recent publication examining the overall prevalence of recurrent pregnancy loss and the distribution of its major etiological categories.
Despite its clinical and emotional impact, robust data on how common RPL truly is, and how its causes are distributed, have remained surprisingly limited and heterogeneous.
In this systematic review and meta-analysis of 105 studies and nearly 48,000 women with RPL:
- The estimated population-based prevalence of RPL was approximately 1%, although based on very limited data
- The largest proportion of cases remains unexplained (37%)
- Other major categories included:
- Acquired thrombophilia (12%)
- Endocrine factors (8%)
- Anatomical factors and hereditary thrombophilia (6%)Our findings highlight substantial between-study heterogeneity, partly driven by geographic, demographic, and temporal factors.
Importantly, this work underscores a key issue in reproductive medicine:
- A significant proportion of RPL cases still lack a clear etiological explanation
- There is an urgent need for standardized definitions, diagnostic approaches, and reporting frameworks
To our knowledge, this is among the first meta-analytical syntheses focusing specifically on the prevalence of RPL alongside its etiological distribution, addressing a major gap in the literature.
Grateful to all co-authors for their collaboration:
Tiago Pereira Carvalho, Miguel Dias, Filipa Moutinho, Sofia Serra, Teresa Costa, João Paulo Martins, Gonçalo Duarte
Read the full article.”
Title: Recurrent pregnancy loss: systematic review and meta-analysis of overall prevalence and the distribution of major etiological categories
Authors: Tiago Carvalho, Miguel Ângelo-Dias, Filipa Moutinho, Sofia Silvério Serra, Teresa Costa, João Paulo Martins, Gonçalo S. Duarte, Jorge Lima

Stay updated on all scientific advances in the field of fertility with Fertility News.
-
Sep 15, 2026, 18:18A PCOS Diagnosis Can Stay in the Background of Every Fertility Conversation – Banker IVF and Women’s Hospital
-
Sep 15, 2026, 18:15The Difference Between Ovulation Induction and Ovarian Stimulation – Fertility Plus
-
Sep 15, 2026, 18:13Ritu Anand: What Would I Tell an IVF Couple in the 1980s?
-
Sep 15, 2026, 18:11STP Curriculum Feedback Survey – The Association of Reproductive and Clinical Scientists
-
Sep 15, 2026, 18:09Khushi Mishra: ICSI – Where Precision Meets the Possibility of Life
-
Sep 15, 2026, 18:06Khalil Faaed: The Future of niPGT-A Is Not Just Non-Invasive…
-
Sep 15, 2026, 18:04Anuradha Housnur: ICSI Is Not About Injecting the Sperm…
-
Sep 15, 2026, 18:02Snehal Kaware: Can an Oocyte With a Vacuole Still Fertilize?
-
Sep 15, 2026, 17:59Kanishka Gaur: Amenorrhea Is a Symptom, Not a Diagnosis
